March 5, 2008
In the wake of the Ohio and Texas primaries, it's clear sailing for presumptive Republican nominee John McCain but a cloudy future for Democrats Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
reason Associate Editor David Weigel follows electoral politics with intensity and insight. The day after the primaries, he sat down with reason.tv to discuss how McCain nabbed the GOP nod, how Clinton stopped Obama's momentum, and how November is likely to shape up (four minutes).
Click below to watch.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
David Weigel follows electoral politics with intensity
and insight.
For god's sake, Mr. Gillespie, who puts you up to writing this
tripe?
I am at work and can't WTFV, but I'm just going to assume that Hawkwind's "We took the wrong step years ago" is playing in the background.
Click 'n' Learn | March 5, 2008, 3:42pm | #
I'll have to remember to go easier on Weigel in the
future.
ROTFLMFAO
Dude... thats not really funny in the way you mean.
I mean, you're crazy and retarded... he's just a *dork*. On overall
points, you're WAYYYYY behind. And if you havent caught on yet
=
NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK
your credibilty is like, what equity people would call "BETA". as
in, whatever's generally right?... you would behave the exact
opposite.
...until Weigel starts talking about Hillary. Then the music switches to "I Am the Center of This Universe".
GILMORE: Dude, lonewackjob is definitely mopping floors with the rest of the gammas.
I found the videeo insightful.
I disagree, however, with Mr. Weigel's precidtion that a continued
Dem. primary fight will lead to a McCain victory in Nov.
Even a bloodied Dem. will defeat McCain. As an Arizona native and
resident, I promise you that McCain does not have what it takes to
run the effective campaign he will need to run.
McCain is very unpopular with AZ GOP voters, and his hypocrisy over
issues like campaign finance reform and taxation will ultimately
eat away at this false aura of integrity that surrounds him.
Also, the American people simply will not accept a continuation of
many of GWB's policies , nor will they elect to be led by an
up-tight, status quo Naval Academy stiff.
But I am biased.
I'll apologize to Weigel, noting that I don't usually call people names in that way (in other ways, yes).
I have seen several photos of Mr. Weigel. He looks like Charlie Sheen, but much bigger. He is taller than you'd think. He could crush your larynx between his thumb and forefinger from about five feet away. Watch yourselves.
Interesting point, that Hillary might be raising the issue of Florida and Michigan not because she expects their "elected" delegates to be seated, but as a way to get Superdelegate support.
NO ONE CARES WHAT YOU THINK
Actually...you are quite mistaken about that, Gilmore. I care what
Lonewacko has to say - I even visit his website occasionally. But
then, you probably don't care what I think either. I gotta tell ya
though, dude, the very thought of that just tears my heart out. You
just know it does. ;-)
I care what Lonewacko has to say - I even visit his website
occasionally
Are you a graduate researcher on abnormal psychology?
If not... ? ... I can't put it together.
Are you a graduate researcher on abnormal
psychology?
Nope. I just don't restrict myself to reading or listening to only
one point of view. Besides - the way all of you here at H&R rag
on him whenever he posts, I figured I should check him out for
myself. Hell, I even read Lew Rockwell sometimes and some of the
Objectivism sites. I wander here and there.
Weigel really looks like a sexually repressed adolescent. Are sexually repressed adolescents a big libertarian constituency? It would explain a lot.
smartass sob | March 5, 2008, 9:22pm | #
How old are you?
Me? I turned 58 a month ago - why? How old are you?
Weigel really looks like a sexually repressed adolescent.
Are sexually repressed adolescents a big libertarian constituency?
It would explain a lot.
Hmm. The last time I thought insulting a person's appearance was an
effective way of criticizing his thoughts, I was about 11 years
old. Are you a pre-pubescent, MK2? It would explain a lot.
Jen, Baby, who said anything about Weigel's thoughts? That's like attacking me for something I said in one of your dreams. Have you been dreaming about me? That would explain a lot.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245