Brian Doherty | August 20, 2007
(Page 2 of 2)
“To keep you is no benefit, to destroy you is no loss” was adopted as an official slogan of sorts by the Cambodian communists to refer to the urbanites and moderns they wanted annihilated. Both these films show that ghoulish phrase for the hideous lie it is. Both films ended with title cards about how, though the Khmer Rouge managed to kill many specific people, the victims' spirit and accomplishments live on.
That can seem like the sort of banality people mutter to quiet inner voices of outrage and pain. But the truth in it is the basis of all human civilization: we can send signals from our brains and hearts across generations and across nations. Whether murdered by fanatical advocates of evil ideologies or not, we will all end up dead. But not all of us will have people singing our songs, and our praises, decades after we’re gone. That Ros Sereysothea, who disappeared mysteriously under Khmer Rouge control, achieved that is proof enough that the Khmer Rouge failed.
Senior Editor Brian Doherty is author of This is Burning Man and Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
I saw Dengue Fever last summer in Seattle and they were awesome. I'm going to have to see this movie.
Great article, Brian.
I've always found the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot to be the scariest of
incredibly scary monstrous mass murderers.
I think it has something to do with that slogan--"to destroy you is
no loss"-- that conveys such sheer animal brutality. It's not an
ideology, it's a death cult.
It might also be because there are too many damn movies and video
games abou WWII.
One of the things I'll miss when I someday flee LA for The
Family Compound somewhere will be Asian political and economic
immigrants. I went to elementary school with children of Hong Kong
millionaires, Indonesian, Philipino and Korean shopkeepers, and
Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees.
I was too young to really understand what the refugees had been
through. I'm glad. I wish my parents had been more welcoming to
them. I don't recall my parents telling me they'd protested the
Japanese internment, though, so I suppose that's no surprise.
One of my college roommates had been a refugee. When her family
came to visit, they stayed physically close to one another wherever
they were - they almost huddled together. My roommate explained to
me later that they'd learned to stay close for protection from
physical attack. Staying together also lessened the chances that
someone would simply disappear.
I had a co-worker whose parents had been sent to separate labor
camps. They were scientists. They both survived their time in the
camps, but they were not allowed to continue working in their field
after they were released - one parent went into sales and the other
managed to escape to the US with her daughter, my coworker.
When I meet people from other parts of the country who think all
Asian people are Chinese, I get a little hot. These are usually
also the same people who think all Hispanic people are Mexican, and
all Indian subcontinental-types are Mooslim Ay-rabs.
Are you trying to imply that the Khmer Rouge killed a lot of
people in Cambodia? As a fan of Noam Chomsky, I can tell you that
they only killed a few thousand people at most and all of those
people were American foreign agents who deserved to die. At least
that is what Dr. Chomsky has told us, and as we all know, he is
never wrong.
Now if you will excuse me, I have to read a book, with a forward by
Dr. Chomsky, detailing how the Holocaust never happened.
It's surprising to me how limited the information is about
Cambodia and the Khmer rouge holocaust.
For those interested, one documentary that's available through
Netflix is S21: la machine de
mort Khmère rouge (It has english subtitles.) Ex-Khmer Rouge
death camp guards speak with a former prisoner as he seeks to
document what happened.
Now if you will excuse me, I have to read a book, with a
forward by Dr. Chomsky, detailing how the Holocaust never
happened.
(Probably a stupid question, but) Is this a real book? Which?
I am a big fan of classic Khmer music, and I am a lifelong libertarian. So I was very please to see the webpage I made devoted to Ros Sereysothea (the golden voice of Cambodian music) is linked to in this article! She was murdered by the Khmer Rouge, one of about 2 million to die in under four years of collectivist rule. Anyway, check out her music and thanks to Reason for speaking up for our rights.
Now if you will excuse me, I have to read a book, with a
forward by Dr. Chomsky, detailing how the Holocaust never
happened.
(Probably a stupid question, but) Is this a real book?
Which?
Nah, Chomsky would never give the Fascists any kind of break. I
mean, they're practically anarcho-capitalists, to extrapolate from
the complaints of so many whiny, self-righteous syndicalists. I'm
more curious about the claim that he's made excuses for the
Rouge.
Nah, Chomsky would never give the Fascists any kind of
break.
Hahaha. I hope you actually don't believe this bullshit.
http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2004/11/chomsky_and_hol_1.html
Let me retyped my above post to avoid confusion.
"Nah, Chomsky would never give the Fascists any kind of
break."
I hope you don't believe that bullshit.
Visit this site:
http://oliverkamm.typepad.com/blog/2004/11/chomsky_and_hol_1.html
"Nah, Chomsky would never give the Fascists any kind of break. I
mean, they're practically anarcho-capitalists, to extrapolate from
the complaints of so many whiny, self-righteous syndicalists. I'm
more curious about the claim that he's made excuses for the
Rouge."
For someone who makes such definitive statements on what Chomsky
supposedly believes, it is absolutely amazing how you are so
ignorant about his apologies for the Khmer Rouge. This is roughly
akin to defending the Catholic Church's view of science during the
Renaissance without knowing who Galileo is.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245