Are false abuse charges a common tactic in child custody
battles?
Cathy Young from the December 2006 issue
(Page 2 of 7)
/span>
/p>
p>
span class="c2">A look at some cases publicized as judicial
outrages against women and children shows just how difficult it can
be to sort out the truth. A major segment of
Breaking the
Silence
dealt with 16-year-old Fatima Alilire-Loeliger and her
mother, Sadia Alilire, who had lost custody of the girl in 1998 to
her father, Scott Loeliger, but then regained it. (The mother and
daughter appeared under pseudonyms, but their real names were
revealed in the subsequent controversy). Men’s rights activist
Glenn Sacks charged that Alilire, far from being the heroic mother
portrayed in the film, was a child abuser herself—a charge he
backed up with documents posted on his website. Alilire responded
on the website of feminist blogger Trish Wilson, claiming the abuse
charges were engineered by her ex-husband with the help of a
therapist with whom he had a close personal
relationship.
o:p>
/o:p>
/span>
/p>
p>
Yet the documents posted by Wilson and
Alilire
span class="c2">themselves show that Alilire had a
history of violence toward her ex-husband and toward his
babysitter, and that another therapist with no connection to
Loeliger reported Fatima’s allegations of physical abuse by her
mother. The records generally paint a depressing picture of two
parents behaving badly, rather than a case in which a clear line
can be drawn between wrongdoer and victim.
o:p>
/o:p>
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245