The roots and the reach of the religious right.
Daniel McCarthy from the December 2006 issue
(Page 3 of 11)
First
Things
for those who today use such language in the context of
President Bush’s war on civil liberties. And Christian
conservatives no longer feel so despondent about democracy. The
president has assiduously cultivated their support, an effort
rewarded in 2004 when nearly 80 percent of evangelical Protestant
voters and 52 percent of Catholics voters cast their ballots for
Bush.
o:p>
/o:p>
In the wake of that election we’ve
/span>
span class=
"CRbreakgrafline">seen an avalanche of literature purporting to
explain the revival of the religious right and its implications for
the country. Patrick Hynes’
In Defense of the Religious
Right
celebrates Christian conservatives’ power, even while
claiming Christian conservatives are harried and besieged, ever on
the defensive against an encroaching liberalism. Damon Linker, on
the other hand, argues in
The Theocons
that it’s the
religious right, and the
First Things
coterie in
particular, that’s doing the encroaching. Each gets only half the
story right. Hynes fails to prove that Christian conservatives are
the persecuted majority he thinks they are, while Linker is
persuasive about the aggressive agenda of the religious right. But
Hynes better explains where Christian conservatives’ real power
lies—not with a Catholic elite, as Linker would have it, but with
the mass of evangelical voters loyal to the party of
Lincoln.
o:p>
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245