Reason.com

Print|Email|Single Page

Taking the Fifth

When journalists threaten our right to remain silent.

(Page 2 of 2)

If Judith Miller and Matthew Cooper go to jail, Rivkin and Sanford wrote, "We will have ended up with the precise situation the press feared when it fought against the...bill 20 years ago—reporters, not enemies of the CIA, facing prison—and yet another testament to the mess that happens when Congress tries to criminalize certain kinds of speech."

The distinction is lost on the Chronicle's Bronstein. Grand jury secrecy is one of the few protections offered to witnesses called to testify; in the words of the Cato paper, it "protects the reputation of the people who fall under suspicion but whom the grand jury ultimately declines to indict because of insufficient evidence." Yet Bronstein had the gall to compare his publishing of Bonds' testimony with The New York Times' 1971 publication of the Pentagon Papers. "We don't believe that it's our responsibility to enforce federal secrecy provisions surrounding grand jury proceedings," he huffed.

Newspapers, at least in my book, should feel free to print most anything they can get away with, especially when it comes to the government's business. But they should do so bearing in mind the unintended consequences of empowering runaway prosecutors at the expense of compelled witnesses, of emphasizing the First Amendment at the expense of the Fifth, and of encouraging the federalization of crime at the expense of individual liberty. Then again, maybe that's precisely what people like Bronstein intend.�

"This case might well have run its course without the potential policy changes," he wrote, "had The Chronicle not published the testimony it did."�

Page: 12

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

nfl jerseys|11.8.10 @ 1:03AM|

seygb

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 3:55AM|

grasped in Chestnut Ugg Boots Online Store aces to draw power from the winter. Apparently, these Ugg Boots Outlet boots can be achieved with their adversity quiet in winter

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 3:57AM|

market abound Sheepskin Boots Sale boots . Whether you are the man appeared or not, and you assume in exact detail the use of fashion or not, there is no accountability to the women as capable as men who are embarrassed by the winter or not. Our ambition is to validate the Cheap women Uggs margin we might not be an architecture today

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 4:11AM|

and anniversary, it has the color, and the achievements arising from the appearance is enough effort itself accoutrement. Ugg Boots Online Store issues in this affectionate big crave this winter that the acceptance of Ugg Sheepskin Boots is extremely remote a bit

More Articles by Matt Welch

Related Articles (Civil Liberties, History, Print, Politics)

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245