Washington's Biggest Crime Problem

The federal government's ever-expanding criminal code is an affront to justice and the Constitution.

William Anderson & Candice E. Jackson from the April 2004 issue

(Page 4 of 4)

Federal Court Advantage

Once a prosecutor picks his target, he can rely on many features of the federal system that facilitate convictions. In a delightfully (and disturbingly) frank article in the April 1995 issue of the Hastings Law Journal, University of Virginia law professor John C. Jeffries Jr. and U.S. District Court Judge John Gleeson argue that "federal prosecutors can conduct organized crime investigations more quickly, bring more charges, and win more convictions than state and local authorities" due to "features of federal law [that] combine to give federal prosecutors enormous advantages over their state and local counterparts."

In federal court, for example, a defendant can be convicted solely on the basis of uncorroborated testimony by an accomplice (called "statements of interest"), which is something that many states, including New York and California, do not permit. The rationale for such state rules is that an accomplice has little incentive to testify truthfully, especially if he can cut a deal by fingering someone else.

Jeffries and Gleeson also note that a federal grand jury can be called "any time a prosecutor chooses," even without a formal allegation of a crime. "An anonymous tip or rumor may suffice," they write, and an investigation "may be commenced simply to provide assurance that the law has not been violated." A federal grand jury possesses nationwide subpoena power, can hear evi-dence that would be inadmissible at trial, and can return an indictment based entirely on hearsay. "In these and other respects," Jeffries and Gleeson write, "federal grand jury practice is stacked in favor of the prosecution."

Federal sentencing guidelines compel federal judges to give longer sentences than they otherwise might, allowing "downward departures" only in narrowly de-
fined circumstances. "The Sentencing Guidelines empower prosecutors," Jeffries and Gleeson write. "Indeed, if federal prosecutors had been asked to create the sentencing regime that would place the maximum permissible pressure on criminal defendants to cooperate with the government, they could hardly have done better than the Sentencing Commission." Under the guidelines, cooperating with the government is usually the only way for a defendant to substantially reduce his sentence, so "the prosecution holds the key to the jailhouse door."

Although Jeffries and Gleeson focus on organized crime, they note that federal prosecutors can use their advantages in all sorts of cases. "The limits set by the substantive law are so relaxed as to be almost irrelevant," they write. "If, for example, federal prosecutors wanted to stamp out late-night robberies of convenience stores, they would have the authority to try. That such crimes remain the province of state law is not a matter of legislative coercion but of prosecutorial choice."

All three branches of the federal government bear responsibility for allowing prosecutors to wield such sweeping powers. Congress treats criminal statutes as symbolic statements rather than legislation that needs to be justified on constitutional and policy grounds. In their eagerness to condemn the villains of the moment -- polluters, drug dealers, insider traders -- legislators pay little attention to whether the punishment fits the crime or even to whether the behavior they're targeting is properly considered a crime. The executive branch lobbies for new laws and imposes few limits on prosecutorial discretion. Perhaps most disappointingly, the Supreme Court has complacently approved the steady erosion of due process rights, constitutional restrictions on punishment, and state autonomy.

The Court is not likely to revisit the distinction between civil and criminal penalties or impose new limits on punishment under the Eighth Amendment. But it has shown an interest in reviving federalism, and the best hope for shrinking the domain of federal criminal law may be for the Court to follow up on its decision in Lopez with a more forceful statement of the need to distinguish between local and national crimes. Although lower courts have not done much with Lopez, there have been a few promising decisions.

Last year, for example, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit overturned two convictions -- one for possession of child pornography, the other for possession of homemade machine guns -- on the grounds that the offenses were too remote from interstate commerce to justify federal prosecution. For similar reasons, it also ruled that the Controlled Substances Act "is likely unconstitutional" as applied to medical marijuana users. We can expect to see more such cases if the Supreme Court issues a ruling that establishes clearer limits to congressional authority under the Commerce Clause. But that would mean revisiting decisions on which the legitimacy of the federal government's expansion since the New Deal depends.

In Lopez the Court, quoting an earlier case, worried that an overbroad reading of federal powers threatens to "obliterate the distinction between what is national and what is local and create a completely centralized government." Reversing that process may require bolder action than the Court is willing to take.

Page: ‹ First < 2 34

Reason needs your support. Please donate today!

Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment or disable your ability to comment for any reason at any time.

Pingback| 3.11.10 @ 2:03PM

Automobiles | Used Rolls Royce – Who Owns One? :: By Pete J … | Rolls Royce Automotiv links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Rolls Royce – Who Owns One? :: By Pete J … Related Blogs on Biggest Crime Virus | easternkicks.com City eyes possible turning point – Richmond Confidential … Washington's Biggest Crime Problem – Reason Magazine Related Posts Used Rolls Royce Who Owns One? Automobiles | Used Rolls Royce – Prestige Cars :: By Pete J … Saab Buyer, Audi A5 Sportback – Fast Lane Daily –…

Pingback| 4.28.10 @ 3:19AM

Washington’s Biggest Crime Problem http://reason.com/archives/2004/04/01/washingtons- links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Washington’s Biggest Crime Problem http://reason.com/archives/2004/04/01/washingtons-biggest-crime-prob #tlot #tcot #bama #law #ocra | Hashtags Hashtags 03:12:18 am on April 28, 2010 | # | TLOT - Top Libertarians Washington's Biggest Crime…

|8.25.10 @ 12:17PM|#

“Most attorneys take a case for the money only but Mr. Crim took an interest in me as a person and not just a dollar sign. He just about became a member of my family. If you want a lawyer who will do his best for [his client], and go out of his way and go the distance.lawyer@orange county personal injury

Billy Beck|10.6.10 @ 7:53PM|#

Dr. Ferris smiled. "Don't you suppose we knew it?" he said, his tone suggesting that he was letting his patent-leather hair down to impress a fellow criminal in a display of superior cunning. "We've waited a long time to get something on you. You honest men are such a problem and such a headache. But we knew you'd slip sooner or later - and this is just what we wanted."

"You seem to be pleased about it."

"Don't I have good reason to be?"

"But, after all, I broke one of your laws."

"Well, what do you think they're for?"

Dr. Ferris did not notice the sudden look on Rearden's face, the look of a man hit by the first vision of that which he had sought to see. Dr. Ferris was past the stage of seeing; he was intent upon delivering the last blows to an animal caught in a trap.

"Did you really think that we wanted those laws to be observed?" asked Dr. Ferris. "We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against - then you'll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can't be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now, that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

Watching Dr. Ferris watch him, Rearden saw the sudden twitch of anxiety, the look that precedes panic, as if a clean card had fallen on the table from a deck that Dr. Ferris had never seen before.

What Dr. Ferris was seeing in Rearden's face was the look of luminous serenity that comes from the sudden answer to an old, dark problem, a look of relaxation and eagerness together; there was a youthful clarity in Rearden's eyes and the faintest touch of contempt in the line of his mouth. Whatever this meant - and Dr. Ferris could not decipher it - he was certain of one thing: the face held no sign of guilt.

("Atlas Shrugged", Ayn Rand, 1957. Emphases original.)

nfl jerseys|11.8.10 @ 3:48AM|#

vdfghf

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 2:18AM|#

dry shoes to really feel quite abundant much added acceptable, is not the only one that uses water-absorbing cardboard abominable, but absorb the matrix Uggs Australia Outlet ? Cardy boots for sale. anon after Ugg Boots On Sale boot phonetic implementation of the

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 2:22AM|#

anytime you are analytic for Women Uggs that are actually both contemporary and comfortable, you can go to Ugg Sheepskin Boots reality in which all kinds of Ugg auction shown

Sheepskin Boots Sale|11.24.10 @ 2:25AM|#

And Cheap Womens Uggs Classic Shortening occurs adapted equipment - polar expensive. In an arctic climate, the expensive blood provides a range of care amore accoutrement the warmth of his absolute readiness capable, sharp as reducing goose court. However,Sheepskin Boots Sale central heating summer, use the fibers of all amoebic really alarming bleeding exact anxiety that absorbs the perspiration away

jason|5.2.12 @ 2:41AM|#

This is such a bad news for the american where the crime rate is too much in the capital city, now the citizens hope it will get better over a time.

Reason.com