Elizabeth Koch | March 3, 2004
(Page 2 of 3)
Counsel: [Cough. Inaudible question.]
Judge: I certainly do not want to interfere with any juror who wants to be interviewed once I release them.
Counsel: [Inaudible comment.]
Judge: The jurors were made aware the questionnaire would never be public—it's a very unusual request to ask me to violate my promise to the jury.
Her laugh summons visions of a hurtling gavel. Hope the guy has quick reflexes.
Counsel: The public had a right...
Judge: My word is my bond.
Counsel: (Inaudible statement.)
Judge: What case? No Supreme Court case advises it should be made public.
Counsel: [Inaudible statement.]
Judge: I have no intention of preventing reporters from doing their job. My job is to preserve the system of justice and the jury's privacy.
Counsel: [Inaudible question.]
Judge: Cameras are not allowed in the courthouse.
Counsel: [More.]
Judge: What possible relevance? What possible relevance does the face of a juror have on the public? Besides to help sell newspapers.
Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now!
Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not completely satisfied.
Site comments/questions:
Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:
(310) 367-6109
Editorial & Production Offices:
3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245