Like many voracious readers I know, I haven't been to a public library for years. When I want obscure information, I troll the Web from my home or office. When I want a book, I buy it used on Amazon. When I want to browse, I head to Borders, mostly because it, unlike the library, is still open after I get off work. And when I want to enjoy the ambiance of musty, old-fashioned stacks, I rent Ghostbusters. (I doubt I'm alone in this.)
Nevertheless, I was glad to hear that people who do depend on public libraries for online access won't have to browse a sanitized, government-approved version of the Web. Three federal judges ruled today that the government can't force libraries to filter Internet access by denying funding. The decision strikes down the two-year-old Children’s Internet Protection act, a federal law intended to protect kids from porn.
“Any public library that adheres to CIPA’s conditions will necessarily restricts patrons’ access to a substantial amount of protected speech in violation of the First Amendment,” the judges wrote, striking a blow for free--or at least freer--speech.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.