If a foreign government turns out to be involved in plotting the attack, then it isn't merely the rules of war that might be invoked. A violent attack on the U.S. by another state would land us in response four:
4. The Bugs Bunny Option
This one's named for the great American who, when attacked, routinely remarks, "Of course you realize this means war."
This would be a limited war, aimed not at "rooting out terrorism" but at treating those terrorists who are affiliated with foreign governments the same as those who are independent agents. As with Bronsonism and Kojakism, it limits its fire to the conspirators and their henchmen, leaving civilians spared. If you're looking to bomb cities or occupy Afghanistan, you'll have to go well beyond Bugs.
These last three responses share a problem. If the Gandhi option addresses the question of security while leaving justice undone, the others aim for justice but leave us insecure. Arrest or kill Osama bin Laden, and his lieutenants will take over his war. Capture them, and other branches of his very loose network will step into the breach. Bring down a government, and heaven knows what might take its place.
And that brings us to the biggest decision. Do we defend ourselves against this attack, whatever that entails, and then withdraw from the Middle East, fusing a rigorous and vigorous self-defense with non-intervention in other nations' affairs? Or do we dig in for a long fight against the social landscape of the Mideast? Do we, in the words of The New York Times' Thomas Friedman, fight "a long, long war" against "all the super-empowered angry men and women out there"?
5. The Caesar Option
If you prefer this alternative--if you favor a long war against a ubiquitous enemy--then be aware of the likely consequences:
• The war will not merely be long. It will be perpetual. We will not be fighting an army, after all, but a tactic--terrorism--that can be adopted by small cells anywhere in the world. More: We will be fighting a mindset, one which will probably be inflamed still further by the battle against it. We will never know when the war is over, or when we're finally safe. Innocent civilians will die--not just abroad, but here (as if we needed to be reminded) in America.
• The U.S. will become a garrison state. When you're fighting a perpetual war against an enemy that operates without borders, citizens will become suspects. Privacy, due process, freedom of association, and freedom of movement will be curtailed. Given politicians' predilections, the same fate will likely befall free speech and the right to bear arms.
• Whatever authoritarian measures afflict us domestically will be meted out several times over to states abroad, since that will be where most of the actual terrorists live. Dictatorship, of course, is nothing new in the Middle East. But now the governments will be answering to the United States, which can scarcely trust the Taliban to do its terrorist-hunting for it. America will have to act forthrightly as an empire.
In short, the Caesar option will probably fail to bring us security or justice. The only way around this would be not just to dominate the potential terrorists of the Middle East, but to wipe them out. Incredibly, there are those who are proposing just this.
6. The Strangelove Option
Not long after the attacks, Sam Donaldson asked the Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, whether we can "rule out" the use of nuclear weapons. He received this response:
"We have an amazing accomplishment that's been achieved on the part of human beings. We've had this unbelievably powerful weapon, nuclear weapons, since, what, 55 years now plus, and it's not been fired in anger since 1945. That's an amazing accomplishment. I think it reflects a sensitivity on the part of successive presidents that they ought to find as many other ways to deal with problems as is possible."
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
Crusader|9.9.11 @ 11:48PM|#
Nuke Mecca!
Turn the whole sandbox into a sheet of glass and drill through to the oil.
yonemoto|9.10.11 @ 5:08PM|#
oil's too close to the surface dude, you can put a straw in the sand and black tar will bubble up.
Lester|9.10.11 @ 8:27PM|#
Texas Tea
Earl|9.10.11 @ 8:28PM|#
Black Gold
|9.10.11 @ 8:41AM|#
Sadly, option #5 is the one that has been chosen.
|9.11.11 @ 5:11PM|#
Apart from:
These appear to becoming more free.
|9.10.11 @ 12:04PM|#
This is the secret thread.
yonemoto|9.10.11 @ 5:09PM|#
truly, the other thread became tiresome. I claim some responsibility. Now I am here to muck up this thread too.
|9.10.11 @ 12:30PM|#
Clearly, we (meaning the Bushitler administration and his democratic catamites -literally?- in congress) chose Caesar. The Constitution was used for toilet paper at the White House.
|9.10.11 @ 12:46PM|#
Prescient indeed, Jesse.
|9.10.11 @ 1:54PM|#
Behold, The Commenters' Inner Sanctum Santorum of Hit & Run!
|9.10.11 @ 8:10PM|#
We need some blink tags up in this bitch; get the freedom started.
Earl|9.10.11 @ 8:32PM|#
Hey heller!
Stop listening to that shitty FAG music!
Here's some Rock n' Roll
Neu Mejican|9.11.11 @ 2:09AM|#
Guitar Wolf: "Love has no borders, nationalities, or genders!"
Wild Zero (2000)
|9.11.11 @ 5:23PM|#
I hope you've renewed your rock and roll license!
SIV|9.10.11 @ 8:35PM|#
Perhaps the Taliban, and their civilian supporters, should have thought about "blow back".
Cliché Bandit|9.12.11 @ 12:41PM|#
for a fleeting second I actually thought Yonemoto was commenting 10 years ago.