Reason Magazine

Print|Email|Single Page

The Mommy Wars

Why feminists and conservatives just don't get modern motherhood.

(Page 4 of 4)

Notably, too, family-friendly workplaces in America are not being created by government fiat but by companies anxious to retain good workers --and, rather embarrassingly for progressives, the resistance to these policies often comes from labor unions. Dana Friedman, a senior advisor with Bright Horizons, a company that provides worksite childcare and corporate consulting on family issues, says that non-unionized workplaces tend to offer far more "work-life benefits," such as flextime and telecommuting opportunities, than unionized ones.

Of course, any policy changes that would let families keep more of their earnings would help parents, though it's unlikely that such steps would entice many women to go home. (The Reagan tax cuts in the 1980s had precisely the opposite effect, by spurring job growth and reducing marginal tax rates on two-income couples.) So would policies promoting real flexibility in the workplace, such as Republican-backed legislation that would allow employees to trade extra overtime pay for extra time off--an arrangement forbidden under current federal law. Though the Republicans are clearly more at home with a family model based on Leave It to Beaver, such measures are clearly based on the understanding that combining work and child rearing is part of the new reality.

Full-time child rearing, whether for short or extended periods, will always remain an option--though perhaps a less gender-specific one. But what is far more important is that a more dynamic and flexible marketplace will continue to create new choices for both men and women, often blurring the lines between work and home. In a generation or two, most people may find the polarization between "working moms" and "stay-at-home moms" as meaningless as such young entrepreneurs as Debra Ross do now.

Page: ‹ First 2 34

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.

Pingback| 1.11.10 @ 3:36PM

Blame the Libertarians! | The Agitator links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…penning clenched-fist screeds on a variety of hot-button culture war squabbles for the usual roster of conservative outlets, including National Review, AEI, the Weekly Standard, and The Wall Street Journal. My favorite: Thomas once called parents who put their children in daycare “more respectable, less violent versions of Susan Smith.” Smith, you may remember, was the woman who drowned her two sons in a lake in…

nfl jerseys|11.14.10 @ 10:30PM|

hjdgh

|7.14.11 @ 10:15AM|

1. You did not provide evidence that unions are against family friendly work policies by the fact that unionized workers (only 7% of all workers) have less benefits than nonunionized workers...perhaps where unions remain after large corporate anti-unioinism in the country, there is less equity and perhaps greater support for unions.

Leave a Comment

More Articles by Cathy Young

Related Articles (Family Issues, History, Labor, Books, Hillary Clinton)

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245