If it's true that California is a bellwether for the rest of the country, then rent control may be on its last legs. This past summer, in a move widely attributed to the Republican gains in the state Senate, the California legislature voted to replace rent control in five Golden State cities with a policy known as "vacancy decontrol."
Vacancy decontrol, which is in force in Los Angeles and a number of other cities across the state, allows landlords to charge market rates to a new renter whenever a tenant voluntarily leaves a given unit. Annual rent increases for continuous occupants may still be regulated by various local authorities.
"It's not abolition, but it's a major change," says economist Michael St. John, head of St. John & Associates, a Berkeley-based consulting group and author of a 1993 study that documented the negative impact of restrictive rent control on poor and elderly residents in Berkeley and Santa Monica, two cities often cited by rent-control advocates as models to follow.
The California vote follows a 1994 referendum in Massachusetts that abolished rent regulation statewide. The next battleground over rent control is likely to be New York City, whose rent-control regulations expire in 1996 and must be renewed by a now-Republican state legislature and governor. Both Gov. George Pataki and State Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno are outspoken opponents of rent control.
"The prospects look good for a rollbackif not a complete eliminationof rent control in New York," says James Taranto of the Manhattan Institute, a public-policy think tank based in the Big Apple.
Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.
nfl jerseys|11.16.10 @ 11:06PM|#
xtete