The Book Case: Bringing Home the First Amendment

Bringing Home the First Amendment

The Day They Came To Arrest the Book

By Nat Hentoff

New York: Laurel-Leaf Library/Dell 116 pp. $2.25

Reviewed by Kathleen McMenamin with Michael McMenamin

Support for a free press and opposition to government censorship are not attitudes universally held in this country, the First Amendment notwithstanding. In January 1984, the US Court of Appeals in Denver temporarily prohibited a publisher of law books from printing a judicial opinion that offended the federal government; the opinion had been highly critical of what the judge perceived to be grossly unethical conduct by government prosecutors. Earlier that same month, the US Court of Appeals in New York permanently banned the publication of an investment newsletter whose publisher had been refused a printing license by the federal government because he was a convicted felon.

How do attitudes for or against government censorship begin? Are all government lawyers born with the soul of a censor? Or is it an acquired taste? For example, our oldest child, Katie, is 13 and is developing what appears to be a healthy skepticism toward the use and misuse of government power. It is, I suspect, an attitude stemming in part from an independent research project and paper she wrote at age 11 on the Polish government's suppression of the Solidarity labor movement. On the other hand, she is not particularly tolerant of opposing viewpoints on subjects where she has exceptionally strong opinions- sexism and racism being two prominent examples.

Intolerance of obnoxious ideas is one thing; government censorship of them is something else entirely. How do you convey the concept that the former does not-and must not-lead to the latter in a free society? In particular, how does one convey this to a daughter whose attraction to something called "Duran Duran" mystifies her parents, much as our attachment to the Beatles mystified her grandparents?

One possibility is journalist Nat Hentoff, a dedicated civil libertarian, whose regular columns in Inquiry on the First Amendment are quite simply the best commentary being written on freedom of the press. Hentoff displays none of the inconsistencies and hypocrisies displayed by the First Amendment's summer soldiers, liberal and conservative alike, who wrap themselves in its mantle only when their own oxen are being gored.

Hentoff has also written a number of novels for young people. His most recent such novel, The Day They Came to Arrest the Book, concerns the attempted banning of Huckleberry Finn from a high school's library and assigned reading lists. When I came across the novel, I promptly recommended it to Katie, who, to my delight, devoured it over a weekend. Her review and impressions of the book follow.

Michael McMenamin

I never thought much about the First Amendment before I read The Day They Came to Arrest the Book. When my dad gave it to me, I had some idea that the First Amendment concerns freedom of speech and press. I also knew that censorship violates the First Amendment. My friends also know about the First Amendment, since we are studying the Constitution in school; but they don't seem to care about it, because they have never been affected by any violations of the amendment. In my school, we've never seen a book censored.

Mr. Hentoff's novel deals mainly with censorship of high-school books. It takes place at George Mason High School, where parents had been complaining about certain books being offensive and immoral. The principal of the school had been secretly removing these books to avoid going through the school's censorship procedures. When some students and parents accused The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn of being racist, sexist, and immoral, the teacher who had assigned the book for a history class and the new librarian insisted that the correct censorship procedures be used by the principal.

Right at the beginning, the author establishes the principal as the bad guy. The students and the teachers have great times throughout the book making fun of and imitating the principal. He is an amusing character. In fact, all the characters in this book are very identifiable and are as fun to read about as the principal. I think that children understand things better when they can identify with characters in a book who are their own age. A child also would understand this book because it takes place in a school, an environment that they understand.

It was wise for Mr. Hentoff to choose Huckleberry Finn as the book that was censored. First, Huckleberry Finn is a piece of art and not trash. Second, it actually has been censored in high schools. In addition, it has two very clear sides to it. There is a sexist, racist side and a side that says, "I'm just telling about a boy's life and what it was like to live in the time period that he lived in." Mark Twain is an exceptional writer and didn't write the book to offend people. He wrote the book to show the ignorance of those who treat black people in an inhuman way and use words that offend them.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online

  • Video Game Nation: How gaming is making America freer – and more fun.
  • Matt Welch: How the left turned against free speech.
  • Nothing Left to Cut? Congress can’t live within their means.
  • And much more.